Thesis Title: “Exploring Performance Management in the Saudi Arabia Healthcare Context: a Relational Coordination Perspective”.
RQ: What is the impact of performance management on healthcare outcomes in Saudi Arabia: A Relational Coordination perspective.
Basically is to explore the possible positive or negative impact of Pm on relational coordination theory on outcome in Saudi healthcare context.
I may suggest a possible outcome to manage the thesis as follow
1. Define performance management.
2. Performance management key elements
3. Drivers for positive outcome
4. drivers for negative outcome
5. Performance management in healthcare.
6. performance management in Saudi healthcare.
7. Justice type to influence Performance management system.
I would suggest to be contacted with a specialized writer to discuss this outline, I am open for suggestion. If the number of pages is more than enough we can arrange a suggested methodology and survey tool to address on both interview and survey ( a choice of validated tools)
As instructed that they are part from the literature to identify the relevant to answer the research question. Because I was instructed to explore the impact of PM on relational coordination theory on outcome. They supervisor illustrated that there are many research that determine that Relational coordination drives many team and organizations performance outcome of healthcare. So this is know with in the literature. What is not yet know is what drivers influence the level of high and low relational coordination. For this matter it was suggested to address in the literature how performance management impact on relational coordination. Its possible to argue that performance management can have both positive and negative impact on relational coordination level. From the literature, The theory was explored that a combination of high performance working system can drive to high level of relational coordination to outcome, but performance management in specific is what is argued to drive both either negative of positive. When discussed about PM it was suggested that mainly that PM cycle is consist with 3 things 1- Procee ( that can be looked through the procedural justice type ) 2- Implementation ( that is looked through interpersonal and the sup divided the informational and interactional) 3- Outcome (that an be looked through distributive of outcome). The justice touch on performance appraisal process as a significant aspect of PM. As advised to me that hypothesis can be 3 in addition to sup hypothesis when possible on each PM cycle. One note, when writing the literature they addressed that to connect each element when possible on its relations to healthcare, healthcare in Saudi. I will attach a suggested time table they suggested and i put together. I have suggested if we will test some outcome as well, they said not at the moment. We may believe we don’t need. AS many studies have already suggested that. So O think the above outline can be divided to two things Section one Literature 1. Define performance management. 2. Performance management key elements 3. Drivers for positive outcome 4. drivers for negative outcome 5. Performance management in healthcare. 6. performance management in Saudi healthcare. Section two hypothesis building drawing from the literature. 7. Justice type to influence Performance management system. I will add later on into the literature as well more on the they as I have covered many aspects on it previously, and also , on justice outcome and national culture. If you have suggestions that you think it would be helpful, and you believe it will be forming it better feel free to suggest and if we agree we can proceed. I have been struggling with this literature for almost two years and still trying to clarify it to simple as I almost reached a phase where i am stuck. Note that , I have put the outline as things were suggested to me. At the end the supervisor told me to write it as a story